Luana Plaza Araujo vs Jennifer Dourado Zimermman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 01:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Plaza Araujo vs J. Dourado Zimermman

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Araujo 1 - 0 Zimermman
They have played 3 sets in total, with Luana Plaza Araujo winning 2 and Jennifer Dourado Zimermman winning 1. The last match between Luana Plaza Araujo and Jennifer Dourado Zimermman was at the W35 Rio Claro, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Luana Plaza Araujo getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Araujo | 1 |
| Zimermman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Rio Claro(07-09-25)
L. P. Araujo vs J. D. Zimermman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 39.44% (84-129) | Career Total W/L | 28.57% (46-115) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. P. Araujo vs J. D. Zimermman Match Preview:
- How does Zimermman fare on second serve points? Recently, Zimermman has secured 38.1% of points on their second serve, slightly behind Araujo, who has 39.31%.
- In recent return games, Zimermman has been more successful, winning 52.63% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Araujo's 51.67%.
- Who has a better first serve return rate? Araujo leads with 32.2%, whereas Zimermman is at 30.77%.
- When facing breakpoints, Araujo exhibits resilience, saving 55.88% recently, starkly outperforming Zimermman, who hasn't saved any.
- Over the past year, Zimermman shows a better match win rate of 48.48%, while Araujo holds a win rate of 39.47%.
- On indoor hard courts, Zimermman excels with a 71% win rate, whereas Araujo has not won any matches on this surface.
- In the past twelve months, Zimermman has faced slightly lower-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 269.12, compared to Araujo's average opponent ranking of 251.16.
- Why do deciding set performances matter? Zimermman has clinched 57% of deciding sets recently, but Araujo slightly edges with a 63% success rate in the same context.
- A current head-to-head comparison indicates Araujo is more effective at converting breakpoints, with a 47.06% conversion rate versus Zimermman's 20%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating recent form, Araujo holds a slight edge in second serve performance, which could be critical in tight match moments. Zimermman, while showing promise in return games, falls behind in vital areas under pressure, notably failing to save breakpoints.
Though Zimermman’s overall match win rate this past year is higher, Araujo's superior first serve returns coupled with a better conversion rate on breakpoints suggest stronger in-game adaptability and scoring opportunities.
Araujo's consistency, particularly in deciding sets and against high-ranked players, emphasizes their competitive edge, suggesting a robust mental fortitude in tight match scenarios.
Considering these factors and recent trends, it appears Araujo is the prospective winner in this upcoming match.
Luana Plaza Araujo vs Jennifer Dourado Zimermman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. P. Araujo vs J. D. Zimermman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:59:26 | Average Match Time | 2:59:26 |
| 63% (57/91) | 1st Serve % | 64% (61/96) |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (33/61) |
| 26% (9/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (6/35) |
| 71% (10/14) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (6/10) |
| 59% (57/96) | Return Points Win % | 48% (44/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. P. Araujo Recent Matches Played
J. D. Zimermman Recent Matches Played

L. P. Araujo vs J. D. Zimermman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.72% (85/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 28.57% (46/115) |
| 41.20% (192/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 30.06% (104/242) |
| 45.93% (1917/2257) | Games Win/Loss | 40.26% (1232/1828) |
| 36.91% (55/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.00% (16/48) |
| 46.67% (28/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 27.78% (25/65) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (5/2) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 173 | Aces Total | 48 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 699 | Total Double Faults | 208 |
| 1:7:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 317.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.24 |
| 58% (5181/8878) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2521/3846) |
| 57% (2952/5181) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (1297/2521) |
| 40% (1470/3697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (498/1325) |
| 47% (485/1022) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (172/370) |
| 45% (3845/8602) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1538/3648) |
| 40.00% (36/54) | Challenger W/L | 29.79% (14/33) |
| 39.52% (49/75) | Futures W/L | 28.07% (32/82) |
| 40% (84/210) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 28% (44/159) |
| 39% (12/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 45% (19/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 87% (86/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (45/38) |
| 13% (86/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (45/7) |
| 8% (128/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (116/6) |